May 17, 2026
- The All Progressives Congress conducted primary elections nationwide to select candidates for legislative seats, with a combination of direct voting and consensus arrangements used across states.
- Several established lawmakers and political figures secured nominations, and a few locations reported logistical challenges and tensions during the process.
The party’s primary exercise, which focused on nominations for the House of Representatives among other positions, took place in all 36 states and the Federal Capital Territory. In many areas, members participated in direct voting, while in others, party stakeholders agreed on consensus candidates to promote internal cohesion.
Some incumbent lawmakers and influential politicians emerged as winners in competitive contests. In parts of the northwest and southwest, individuals with strong grassroots support secured tickets after robust engagement with delegates and party committees.
Consensus arrangements were used in certain states to reduce disputes, with aspirants voluntarily withdrawing in favour of colleagues who enjoyed broader support. These arrangements helped streamline the process in locations where party leaders sought to limit contention.
Despite widespread compliance with the primary schedule, there were reports of isolated friction in a few communities. Party officials and security personnel were involved in managing these incidents to ensure the safety of participants and observers.
Ahead of the primaries, the party screened aspirants to confirm eligibility, resulting in a number of disqualifications in states where candidates did not meet internal requirements. State party secretariats shared notices of these outcomes in line with established protocols.
Leadership in several state chapters expressed confidence in the conduct of the primaries, noting that arrangements were made to ensure fairness and transparency. In some regions, party executives engaged with aspirants ahead of voting to emphasise the importance of unity.
The schedule for some nominations was adjusted in response to logistical considerations, with certain contests shifted by one day to accommodate organisational needs. Other primary dates remained as previously announced, particularly for governorship and senatorial candidates.
Throughout the process, discussion among members pointed to differing views on how candidates should be selected, with some advocating open primaries while others supported consensus mechanisms. Party officials encouraged stakeholders to work collaboratively as the nomination phase continues.
